WAMP与XAMPP的优缺点-用于运行本地测试服务器

Question

WAMP与XAMPP的优缺点-用于运行本地测试服务器

- 38
- 347645 2010-09-24
哪些主要优点/缺点可帮助您确定选择哪两个:WAMP与XAMPP,用于为WordPress运行本地测试服务器?

PS:我现在看到 Stack Overflow进行了讨论关于它.

What are the major pros/cons that can help in deciding which of the two to choose: WAMP vs XAMPP for running a local testing server for WordPress?

PS: I now see Stack Overflow had a discussion about it.

server xampp local-installation

- 堆栈之间的差异主要在于便利性和界面首选项(无论如何内部组件都相同),这取决于个人喜好.我认为这种选择是主观的.
  
  Difference between stacks is mostly in convenience and interface preferences (internals are same anyway), which is matter of personal tastes. I think this choice is subjective.
  - 2
  - 2010-09-24
  - Rarst
- 两者都不怎么样Linux + Apache + MySQL + PHP怎么样?是的,有待商议:)
  
  How about neither? How about Linux + Apache + MySQL + PHP? Yes, subject to opinion :)
  - 0
  - 2015-06-20
  - s_ha_dum
- 您是否曾经考虑过使用无业游民的盒子?
  
  Have you ever considered using a Vagrant box instead?
  - 0
  - 2016-04-20
  - MikeSchinkel
- 这里很好的讨论-http://stackoverflow.com/q/8664901/2377343
  
  here nice discussion - http://stackoverflow.com/q/8664901/2377343
  - 0
  - 2016-12-08
  - T.Todua

10 个回答

投票数

- 31
- 2011-11-29
XAMPP是 NOT 跨平台.有适用于Windows的XAMPP,适用于Linux和Mac以及适用于Solaris的XAMPP,但是每个软件包都包含不同的软件,以不同的性能运行,等等.(跨平台意味着您使用的软件完全相同,并且可以运行在不同平台上使用相同的方式...就像Azureus曾经是:您可以使用相同方式使用的jar)

Windows的

XAMPP很肿,很忙.您有开箱即用的邮件服务器,FTP服务器,加速器,Web-dav,SSL等.您真的需要它们吗?它并非完全是入门级软件包,但总的来说,它使安装一切变得容易得多.除此之外,任何定制都需要与其他任何预制堆栈相同的工作.但是,如果您将其安装在自己的盒子上,则可能不需要FTP服务器,对吗?

WAMP更轻(大部分是基础知识).拥有AMP的所有内容,除此之外,您还有几个工具phpMyAdmin,SQLite和xdebug.您需要SSL吗?您必须对其进行配置.您要访问邮件服务器?必须自己安装. FTP?同上.

WAMP(如名称所述)仅在Windows(64/32位)上运行 .

对于Windows上的本地计算机,WAMP是必经之路.轻巧,平滑和安装后的配置只需点击一下.由于64位安装方面的问题(自然:要安装更多的膨胀软件,并且您需要在32/64位之间管理每件额外的软件),因此XAMPPfor Windows的竞争对手并不多.
XAMPP is NOT cross-platform. There is XAMPP for Windows, XAMPP for Linux, for Mac and for Solaris, but each pack contains different pieces of software, runs differently with different performance, etc. (cross-platform means that you take the exact same piece of software and it runs the same way on different platforms ... like Azureus used to be: a jar that you could use the same way)

XAMPP for Windows is bloated, big time. You have mail server, FTP server, accelerator, web-dav, SSL out of the box, etc. Do you really need them all? It's not exactly an entry-level package, but in general it makes installation of everything much easier. Beyond that, any customization requires the same effort as for any other pre-made stack. But if you install on your own box, you probably don't need FTP server, do you?

WAMP is lighter (mostly the basics). Everything that's AMP is there, beyond that you have a couple of tools, phpMyAdmin, SQLite, and xdebug. Do you need SSL? You have to configure it. You want access to mail server? Must install it yourself. FTP? Ditto.

WAMP (like the name says) runs only on Windows (either 64/32-bit).

For a local machine on Windows, WAMP is the way to go. Light, smooth and post-install configuration takes a click. XAMPP for Windows isn't much of a competitor due to issues on 64-bit installation (naturally: more bloatware to install, and you need to manage each piece of extra software between 32/64-bit).
- 你好???还有XAMPP lite.
  
  hello??? there is also XAMPP lite out there.
  - 2
  - 2012-02-10
  - phantom.omaga
- 我使用WAMP.如果他们提供了可自定义的下载选项(例如http://getbootstrap.com/customize/),那就太好了.
  
  I use WAMP. It'd be nice if they made a customisable download option much like http://getbootstrap.com/customize/
  - 0
  - 2016-02-25
  - rybo111
- 关于第2点的更新:XAMPP安装程序现在要求安装组件.不再是全部或一无所有.
  
  Update regarding point 2: The XAMPP installer now asks for the components to install. It's not all or nothing anymore.
  - 0
  - 2016-09-19
  - jlh
- [您不应该尝试重新定义术语.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/跨平台)
  
  [You shouldn't try to re-define terms.](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cross-platform)
  - 2
  - 2018-09-23
  - CoffeeandCode
- 7
- 2011-05-22
WAMP是一个缩写,表示:Windows,Apache,MySQL和PHP.

有不同的WAMP"发行版",例如XAMPP,WampServer(有些人简称为" WAMP"), Wamp-Developer Pro (商业软件),以及其他...

用于Windows的XAMPP只是另一个WAMP发行版,仅此而已(也没有其他内容).

WAMP is an acronym that means: Windows, Apache, MySQL, and PHP.

There are different WAMP "distributions", such as XAMPP, WampServer (what some people just call "WAMP"), Wamp-Developer Pro (commercial software), and others...

XAMPP for Windows is just another WAMP distribution, nothing more (nor something else).
- 这是非常误导的.虽然从最广泛的意义上讲这就是" WAMP"的含义,但是当有人问到WAMP与XAMPP之间的比较时,他们显然在谈论这一点:http://www.wampserver.com/en/
  
  This is very misleading. While that is what "WAMP" may mean in the broadest possible sense, when someone asks about a comparison between WAMP and XAMPP, they are obviously talking about this: http://www.wampserver.com/en/
  - 0
  - 2018-05-01
  - Okonomiyaki3000
- @ Okonomiyaki3000答案是大约7年前给出的.当时大约有10多个" WAMP"发行版(大约20多个；但有些是次要发行版).但是,首字母缩写WAMP从2003年开始一直是" Windows/Apache/MySQL/PHP".大多数人似乎认为WAMP是Windows上Apache + MyQL + PHP的1个发行版.它不是.您可以自己安装WAMP.但是我知道您在说什么,而现在可能就是这样.
  
  @Okonomiyaki3000 The answer was given almost 7 years ago. There were about 10+ "WAMP" distributions at that time (it was about 20+; but some were minor distros). However, the acronym WAMP has been "Windows / Apache / MySQL / PHP" since about 2003. Most people seem to think WAMP is 1 distribution of Apache + MyQL + PHP on Windows. It is not. You could make your own WAMP installation. But I understand what you are saying and these days it might be that.
  - 0
  - 2018-05-01
  - rightstuff
- 3
- 2012-02-10
关于XAMPP膨胀的异议(因为它具有邮件服务器,FTP服务器等),可以通过询问您的需求来回答.如果您需要大多数或所有这些物品,那么这就是您的完整XAMPP.对于仅开发网页,包括PHP和MySQL,请使用XAMPP Lite.在不同的时间,我发现两者都很有用.我特别喜欢可以在USB闪存盘上运行.

现在,如果我可以将Netbeans添加到该闪存驱动器中...

The objection that XAMPP is bloated--because it has a mail server, FTP server, etc.--might be answered by asking what you need. If you need most or all of those items, it's the full XAMPP for you. For just developing web pages, including PHP and MySQL, use XAMPP Lite. At different times I've found both to be very useful. I especially like that I can run either on a USB flash drive.

Now if I could add Netbeans to that flash drive...
- 2
- 2010-09-24
除了一个明显的例外,我使用过XAMPP并对此总体感到满意.使用XAMPP时,对我而言,加载网站一直非常缓慢.我不知道WAMP是否就是这种情况,但值得研究.

I've used XAMPP and have been generally pleased with it, with one notable exception. Loading a site has always been agonizingly slow for me when using XAMPP. I don't know if that's the case with WAMP, but it would be worth looking into.
- 2
- 2010-09-24
不是完全回答问题,但是如果您有兴趣学习这些软件包如何协同工作,建议您手动安装和配置它们.我一直在使用本教程作为指导,它已详细介绍并帮助您使一切正常运行并互相交流.它需要做更多的工作,但是却为您提供了更大的灵活性,并且您实际上了解了所涉及的重要配置.

Not exactly answering the question, but if you are interested in learning how the packages work together, I suggest installing and configuring them manually. I've been using this tutorial as a guideline, it is detailed and helps you get everything running and talking to each other. It's a bit more work, but provides you much more flexibility, and you actually learn the important configuration involved.
- 2
- 2011-05-08
WAMP比XAMPP使用更多的内存来运行.

WAMP uses more memory to run than XAMPP.
- 原文
- joey
- 2
- 2014-06-23
我想添加未列出的WAMP的优点.

使用WAMP,您可以安装扩展程序*,使您可以轻松地在不同版本的php之间切换.由于WordPress的最低要求是php 5.2.4,并保证它将在使用它的服务器上运行,为了与WordPress真正兼容,插件需要在该版本的php下运行.php 5.3+中有很多5.2.4中没有的功能,例如命名空间.

如果您是WordPress开发人员,并且希望您的插件,窗口小部件或主题完全兼容并可以在任何WordPress安装上运行,那么使用PHP 5.2.4进行环境设置会很有帮助.XAMPP没有提供简便的方法.

＆ast;应该注意的是,较新版本的WAMP Server不再支持扩展.但是,WAMP Server 2.2(32位)在SourceForge上可用并支持它们.它还具有用于安装php 5.2.4的正确版本的Apache.

I'd like to add an advantage of WAMP that is not listed.

With WAMP you can install extensions* that allow you to easily switch between different versions of php. Since WordPress's minimum requirement is php 5.2.4 and guarantees it will run on a server using it, to be truly compatible with WordPress a plugin needs to run under that version of php. There are a lot of features in php 5.3+ that are not in 5.2.4, such as namespacing.

If you are a WordPress developer and want your plugin, widget or theme to be fully compatible and run on any WordPress install, it is helpful to have an environment setup with php 5.2.4. XAMPP doesn't offer an easy way to do that.

* Should be noted that the newer version of WAMP Server no longer supports extensions; however, WAMP Server 2.2 (32-bit) is available on SourceForge and supports them. It also has the correct version of Apache for installing php 5.2.4.
- 1
- 2011-01-01
在WAMP中实施 SSL 时,我发现比较麻烦(我最终无法处理并放弃了),而在XAMPP中这非常容易.

其余的我想没有区别,因为我同时使用 Linux 和 Windows 而且很舒服当然,我使用XAMPP的时间更长了.

Implementing SSL in WAMP, I found more troublesome (I finally could not handle it and gave up) whereas it was extremely easy in XAMPP.

The rest I suppose there is no difference for as I use both a Linux and a Windows platform and am comfortable. Of course I have been using XAMPP for a much longer period of time.
- 1
- 2011-10-05
XAMPP比WAMP(法语开发人员)慢.我都有.

XAMPP is slower than WAMP (French developer). I have both.
- 原文
- Alvin

EAMann · Accepted Answer · 2010-09-24

22

2010-09-24

最大的区别-WAMP在Windows上运行,XAMPP是多平台的.除此之外,这是个人喜好问题.它们都为您提供了一个Apache-MySQL-PHP环境,该环境在两个系统下都运行相同.

作为记录,我同时使用了这两种方法...并且它们各有利弊.WAMP消耗的内存远比我喜欢的要多,但是非常稳定.XAMPP具有[与WP Cron和fopen()一起使用的烦人的问题](http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/11831),但似乎更轻一些(如果我可以用USB记忆棒运行它,想).

For the record, I've used both ... and they each have their pros and cons. WAMP consumed far more memory than I liked but was pretty stable. XAMPP has [an annoing issue working with WP Cron and fopen()](http://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/11831), but seems a bit lighter (and I can run it off a USB stick if I want).
- 3
- 2011-10-05
- EAMann
AFAIK-XAMPP还具有一些内置扩展名,如`sendmail`.据我所知WAMP没有.(也适用于Java的FTP,Mercury,Tomcat.)

AFAIK - XAMPP also have some extensions that are built-in like `sendmail` . As far as I know WAMP does not . ( also FTP, Mercury, Tomcat for java ..)
- 0
- 2014-03-12
- krembo99