Tezos作为雇主
-
-
我投票结束这个题为离题,因为这不是进行法律或税务讨论的地方.I'm voting to close this question as off-topic because this is not a place for legal or tax discussions.
- 5
- 2019-03-26
- Tom
-
2 个回答
- 投票数
-
- 2019-03-26
您是正确的,在大多数司法管辖区中,如何处理此案的可能性最高.寻找适合您特定司法管辖区的律师,然后尝试浏览
也许可以联系当局并说明情况.
我认为,在这种情况下,一种常见的做法是要求当局提供如何处理具体情况的"原则声明".如果以后的法规发生变化或进行税收审查等,则可以显示该声明.
You are correct there is most likely no precedence in most jurisdictions for how to handle this case. Find a lawyer for your specific jurisdictions and try to navigate
Perhaps reach out to authorities and explain the situation.
I believe a common practice in this type of situation is to request a "principle statement" from authorities how to handle the specific situation. This statement can then be shown if later regulation changes or a tax review etc.
-
- 2019-03-26
一方面,这与我将柠檬水摊放在随机的街道上并从中赚钱并提供虚假发票没什么不同. "钱"应纳税吗?并非如此,因为这不是法律认可的业务(实际上,由于相同的原因,未经授权的街头贩卖在许多地方都是非法的).
实际上,软件开发人员可以很好地宣布自己是自雇人士.如果他/她这样做,他/她不仅应该申报收入,还应申报成本(例如电费,工资等),因此应税收入低于仅来自发票的收入.
另一方面,现实世界与加密世界之间的主要区别在于,出于税务目的,企业的货币不被接受为有效货币.因此,不可能验证来自tezos的收入.开发人员只有成本.
其他人可能会说,在驱使某些加密货币世界发展的反政府精神下,政府应将其覆盖范围保持在加密资产之外.从这个意义上讲,软件开发人员可以在法律范围之外开展业务实际上是一件好事.
关于资金来源,这当然是可用的代币的电子供应.但是,在更深层次上,代币最终具有价值,因为人们同意它们具有价值.对熟悉加密世界的任何人来说,显而易见的是,这种估值可能会发生巨大变化.国家支持的官方资金却不是这种情况,可以用来缴税.
On the one hand, this is no different than me making a lemonade stand in a random street and making money from it, giving a made-up invoice for it. Is the "money" taxable? Not really, because it is not a legally recognised business (actually, because of the same reason, street vending without authorisation is in many places illegal).
In fact, the software developer could well declare itself as self-employed. If s/he does so, s/he should not only declare income but also costs (e.g. electricity, a wage, etc), and so the taxable income is lower than merely the income from the invoices.
On the other hand, the main difference between the real world and the crypto world is that the currency of the business is not accepted as valid currency for tax purposes. Thus, it is not possible to validate the income from, say, tezos. The developer would only have costs.
Others might say that, in the anti-government spirit that drive some of the crypto world, government should keep its reach out of the crypto assets. In this sense, it is actually good that the software developer can do business outside the realm of the law.
Regarding the source of the money, this is, of course the electronic supply of tokens available. But, on a more deeper level, ultimately, tokens have value because people agree they have value. As it is plainly evident to anyone familiar with the crypto world, such valuation can dramatically change. This is not the case with official money, which is backed by the State, and can be used to pay taxes.
Tezos具有软件开发人员为Tezos协议编写一段代码(扩展,模块或库)并附加发票的独特能力.如果提案被大多数利益相关者接受,则开发人员将收到发票中所提议的金额.
这很可能会带来非常有趣的税收影响.开发人员收到的款项需缴纳所得税.但是,您指定谁为雇主?在这种新的创新中,没有任何法律实体.这个"工作合同"是如何通过的?谁把钱付给开发商?即使这被视为一种自营职业,这些钱从何而来?我认为,这对于我们的法律体系来说是一个全新的场景,目前还不存在.非常像DAO.
有人对这种新的收入形式的法律方面有答案吗?