仓储费,贝克费和分配费
-
-
问题末尾的JSON的来源是什么?节点RPC?What's the source of the JSON in the end of your question? The node RPC?
- 0
- 2020-02-18
- arvidj
-
1 个回答
- 投票数
-
- 2020-02-18
-
您提到的存储和分配成本应该称为burn ,因为它们不会发送给任何人:它们只会从发送者的帐户中删除.当区块链的大小增加时,将应用它们. 费用(例如面包师费用)是支付给某人(在这种情况下为面包师)的费用.
-
当区块链上下文的大小由于交易而增加时,发送者必须支付烧钱.值得注意的是,当合同的存储量增加(存储消耗)或将新合同放到链上(分配消耗)时,还需要显示与公钥哈希对应的公钥.为了使其他参与者验证由该公钥签名的操作,有必要执行后一种操作,称为" <启示> ".启示录的固定成本为0.257tz.
-
是的,这是正确的.请注意,您的情况下的存储空间消耗为0,并且该分配是特定收件人的一次性费用.
The storage and allocations costs you mentions should rather be referred to as burn as they are not sent to anyone: they are only removed from the account of the sender. They are applied when the size of the blockchain increases. Fees, such as the baker fee, are payed to someone, in this case the baker.
When the size of the context of the blockchain increases due to a transaction, the sender must pay a burn. Notably, when the storage of a contract increases (storage burn) or when a new contract is put on the chain (allocation burn) but also when the public key corresponding to a public key hash is revealed. This latter operation, called a revelation, is necessary in order for other participants to verify operations signed by that public key. The revelation has a fixed cost of 0.257 tz.
Yes, that is correct. Note that the storage burn in your case is 0 and that the allocation is a one-time cost for a specific recipient.
-
我对你们的第1点和第3点有点困惑,就像您提到的第一点所说的分配烧写从发件人的帐户上删除了,在第三点上提到的分配成本是特定收件人的一倍.你能解释一下吗i am slightly confused on the 1 and 3rd point of yours like in the first point you mentioned the allocation burn are removed from account of sender and in 3rd point its mentioned allocation cost is one time for specific recipient . could you explain
- 0
- 2020-02-18
- user3759202
-
分配是一次发烧,由发件人为帐户收到的第一笔交易支付.The allocation is a one time burn, payed by the sender, for the first transaction received by an account.
- 2
- 2020-02-18
- arvidj
我在下面的交易中提到了分配费和面包师费.
有人可以帮助我理解
在哪些情况下应用了这些?
这些费用将影响发件人帐户或目标帐户,例如
发件人帐户余额将为: